Test Lab
Test Title
SecureIQLab Cloud Web Application Firewall V4.0 Test Q1 2025
AMTSO Test ID
Platform
Vendor
Publication date
Tested products
| Vendor | Product | Vendor status |
|---|---|---|
| Akamai | App and API Protector | included |
| AWS | AWS WAF & API Shield Gateway | included |
| Barracuda | Application Protection | included |
| Check Point | Cloudguard WAF | included |
| Cloudflare | Cloudflare WAF | included |
| F5 | (Not disclosed) | included |
| Fastly | (Not disclosed) | included |
| Fortinet | FortiWeb Web Application Firewall WAF VM (BYOL) v7.3 | included |
| (Not disclosed) | included | |
| Imperva | Web Application & API Protection | participant |
| Microsoft | Web Application & API Protection | included |
| Prophaze | Appsec WAF as a Service | included |
| Radware | (Not disclosed) | included |
| Traceable | Traceable Cloud WAAP | included |
| Ubika | Ubika WAAP Gateway Cloud v6.15.0 | included |
AMTSO Standard compliance info
Notification issued
Notification method
Test plan
Commencement date
Participants
“Included” Vendors
These Vendors did not chose to adopt Participant status under the AMTSO Standard, but may have engaged with the test lab in other ways.
Commentary dates
| Commentary | Start date | End date |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 Commentary | 2025-01-06 | 2025-06-16 |
| Phase 2 Commentary | 2025-06-16 | 2025-06-30 |
Commentary received
| Vendor | Commentary phase | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Imperva | Phase 2 | As with previous editions, this one was well executed. I would just like to mention that the false positive avoidance tests perhaps deserve to be more discriminating, as most of the vendors obtained a fairly high score (average of 97.91%), even though this is a criterion that has a particularly strong impact on the operational effectiveness of the solutions. |
AMTSO Standard compliance status
| Confirmed Compliant with AMTSO Standard v1.3 | Compliance report |
